The problem is that, while I’ve been reading, I haven’t been rereading the books I want to review; I’ve been reading Discworld, the City Watch books. I don’t particularly want to review Discworld because I hae a feeling it would have to be an all-or-nothing kind of deal and I should really prepare for it. I’ve finished all of my new City Watch books (and thus the whole set of them actually), so I’ll be on to something new next week.
I know what I’ll be reading through this coming fortnight, therefore. It’s what I’ll be reviewing a week from now, my newest favourite series, and I think it might not be as well-known as it deserves to be. We’ll see. But that’s in the future, this week I’ve picked out The Sight and its sequel Fell, by David Clement-Davies.
David Clement-Davies may be more well known for his first novel, Fire Bringer, set in long ago Scotland and about a red deer named Rannoch. The Sight and Fell are set later, in 1400′s Transylvania and mainly follow Larka and Fell, sister and brother (respectively) wolves.
You may be noticing a pattern. David Clement-Davies has written other fantasy books but is most known for his xenoficion, that is, novels written about and from the perspective of non-human beings (e.g. animals or aliens). He writes toward the more animal side of the genre, as opposed to a more anthropomorphic style like, say, Redwall. I would compare his books to Watership Down, but I’ve not yet gotten and read it.
So The Sight and Fell follow wolves, acting like wolves, from the perspective of wolves. It’s not just about wolves though, like Fire Bringer before them, The Sight and Fell have a strong and active mythology. The titular Sight is a power that wolves are sometimes born with which allows them to see visions in water and see through the eyes of other Lera, and do a few other things that saying would be a bit spoiling.
The books use a bit of alternate terminology (Lera=animals, Putnar=hunter/predator, Dragga=alpha male, Drappa=Alpha female). It helps show that the characters are not human, but might also be a bit distracting since everything else is written in English. The characters’ thought processes are not really human either, but you follow what they’re doing and why.
The mythology in the books is strong. The powers of the sight, implications of gods and demons, the afterlife, magic, and beliefs. They’re there and part of the world and the story, but they don’t overpower them. The mythology also isn’t all made up. Some of the beliefs, stories, and mythological figures are definitely recognisable. A different version of the myth of Romulus and Remus is included, for example.
All of the main characters are distinct and dynamic. They grow, and learn, and change. Fell is definitely the biggest example in both books, but every other main character has, by the end of Fell, grown from who they were at the beginning of The Sight.
The main antagonist through the two books is Larka’s and Fell’s aunt, Morgra, who also has the Sight and some shady motives of her own. I will describe her as wicked, and probably villainous, but how ‘evil’ she is really should be left up to the reader. Nothing in either book is really that black and white except Fell’s and Larka’s pelts.
The books explore the natures of the Lera, what good and evil really are, and the motives and driving forces of the characters. The other theme and the driving force behind the books’ plots is the nature of the relationship between Man and (the rest of) Nature. Things build up and the fate of the world may be at stake, though in kind of a distant way. Some characters do die and it’s very sad when they do. Death, not just of characters but also the fact that the characters are carnivores, is handled very well.
The message the books give about that present, about man’s relationship with nature, is that it’s not good and we’re really messing things up, but also that there’s hope and we need to realize we’re also part of nature. This is emphasised toward the ends of both books. I think how well you feel the message was handled will depend on how much you agree with it. It fit very well into the plots, but felt a bit heavy-handed. Then again, it’s probably important enough that it should be.
The settings are well described, though sometimes a bit plain (it is mainly forest, though). The books focus most on the characters and also on the plots, but you still know where it is, when it is, and the world the book are taking place in. It’s easy to go there and lose yourself in the land beyond the forest. The time period they take place in and the humans’ actions are especially well written.
The books are a bit on the long side. They’re only about 500~ish pages each, but the writing style is a bit complicated and lengthy. It’s not excessive description or anything, but the paragraphs can sometimes take a while to say what they’re saying. You don’t want to try reading these when you’re falling asleep or distracted. But the books draw you in fairly well actually, especially in the beginnings, so you might not have too big a problem with the ‘distraction’ part.
The plot of The Sight follows Larka, her family and how they deal with Morgra’s machinations. Larka’s discovery and mastering of the Sight, and finally the climax Morgra has built in accordance with an ancient prophesy. Fell follows, well, Fell as he deals and comes to terms with the events from The Sight. Also introduced is a human girl who has a mysterious history and an important destiny herself, and Fell has to get her to it. The Sight has an interesting, entertaining, and very well-planned plot that starts a lot fo things and takes you along with them. Fell has it’s own plot, just as good as The Sight‘s, but it also gives some longer resolution to and ties up all of the loose threads (even ones you forgot about or didn’t realize were still a bit loose) from The Sight, and is very satisfying about it.
• Characters – 9.5/10
– Very believable and dynamic and very much more wolves than humans.
• Setting – 7/10
– The physical setting can be sparse, but the time period is very well written as it is in all David Clement-Davies’ works. The books focus less on the surroundings and more on the strong characters and plots.
• Plots – 9/10
– The plots are very strong and rather original, and never really fell victim to cliche. Most twists were foreshadowed enough that you could guess what was going to happen, but never distractingly so.
• Themes – 9/10
– The messages are very well explored and portrayed; they are similar in each book but are approached in different ways by two very different characters, and remains very satisfying all the way through.
• Writing – 7.5/10
– I like it when authors do their homework, David Clement-Davies definitely did, he knew what he was writing about. His writing style still reads a bit slowly, though.
For a grand total of 4.2 out of 5. If you’re looking for some fantasy a bit different, you should think about hunting down and devouring some of David Clement-Davies’s books. I would recommend to teenagers and up, to anyone who likes stories about realistic animals, and any of David Clement-Davies to historical fiction fans.
High scores all around my reviews so far, yes? The main reason for this is that I’m reviewing books I own and I try to only buy good books. Don’t worry, there are books or series I will eventually review that will get lower scores in areas.
I personally digested next weeks’ books, so I hope it gets a similar score (4.5+).
Tags: books, books deserving devouring, Fell, The Sight

